Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Regional brain Amyloid-β Accumulation Domain-specific Cognitive Performance in PD

Six individual cortical ROIs and a cerebellum ROI were analyzed for regional 18F-florbetapir binding and to calculate a composite ROI. Representative trans-axial images from a Aβ negative (left) and positive (right) study demonstrate each ROI: (A) parietal cortex and precuneus; (B) frontal cortex; (C) anterior and posterior cingulate gyrus; (D) temporal cortex; and (E) cerebellum. Darker regions indicate higher 18F-florbetapir retention. 

Cognitive and motor characteristics of the study population.

A. Total DRS-2 score was significantly lower in PD-MCI participants (134.3, 131.7 to 136.9) as compared to PD-NC (139.3, 138.1 to 140.6) (t(57) = 4.12, p < 0.001). B. Total DRS-2 score was not significantly different among H&Y stages (F(5,53) = 0.54, p = 0.75). C. UPDRS part 3 score was significantly higher in PD-MCI (24.5, 19.9 to 29.2) as compared to PD-NC (17.1, 14.5 to 19.7) (t(59) = 3.07, p = 0.003). D. UPDRS part 3 score was significantly higher with advanced H&Y stage (1.0: 13.5, 0.2 to 26.8; 1.5: 14.8, 12.4 to 17.1; 2.0: 18.2, 15.5 to 20.9; 2.5: 17.3, 11.8 to 22.9; 3.0: 28.1, 22.3 to 33.9; 4.0: 48) (F(5,55) = 6.57, p < 0.001). There was no association between motor phenotype (TD vs. PIGD) and H&Y stage (data not shown). Data depicted are mean ± 95% C.I. Significance identified by one-way ANOVA post-hoc test. *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001. 

No correlation between composite 18F-florbetapir ROI SUVr and global cognition or memory performance

(A) Total DRS-2 score did not significantly correlate with composite ROI SUVr values, either analyzed in aggregate (F(1,57) = 2.39, p = 0.13) or by cognitive diagnosis (for PD-NC, F(1,39) = 0.02, p = 0.90; for PD-MCI, F(1,16) = 2.15, p = 0.16). (B) DRS-2 memory sub-score did not significantly correlate with composite ROI SUVr values, either analyzed in aggregate (F(1,57) = 3.80, p = 0.06) or by cognitive diagnosis (for PD-NC, F(1,39) = 0.00, p = 0.97; for PD-MCI, F(1,16) = 3.03, p = 0.10).

No comments:

Post a Comment

BStem CSA: Microstructural Cerebral Damage w/Cerebral Microangiopathy

DTI changes of CSA-CSR patients were most prominent in the brainstem.  Subtle microstructural changes in the brainstem might be a neuroanato...